ANALISIS LITERASI SAINS SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR MENGGUNAKAN RASCH ANALYSIS MODEL (RAM)
(1) Prodi PGMI, Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
(2) Program Doktoral Pendidikan Dasar, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta
(3) Program Doktoral Pendidikan Dasar, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta
Corresponding Author
Abstract
In the 21st century, a generation is needed that has the ability to be critical of scientific phenomena around them so that they are able to analyze, make decisions, and solve problems related to issues in their daily lives. Therefore, it is important for every citizen to have good scientific literacy, while the PISA results for Indonesian students' scientific literacy are still below the international average score. This research presents the results of a more comprehensive analysis of students' scientific literacy to identify students' strengths and weaknesses in each relationship between content, context and scientific literacy competency indicators. This type of research is descriptive quantitative research with data collection techniques through tests and data processing using the Rasch Analysis Model (RAM) assisted by Winstep software. From the Winstep output, it is known that the reliability of the instrument expressed in Cronbach's alpha is 0.64. This research was conducted on a sample of 50 elementary school students in Pacitan Regency. Based on the research results, it is known that question items that are difficult for students to work on are items that contain epistemic knowledge content with a local-national context and competence in interpreting data and evidence scientifically. Meanwhile, easy scientific literacy items contain factual knowledge content with personal context and competence in explaining phenomena scientifically. In the test results for eight scientific literacy indicators, it was found that male students' scientific literacy was higher than female students' scientific literacy indicators.
Keywords
References
Andriani, N., Suhendi, E., Samsudin, A., & Ramalis, T. R. (2020). Identification of creative thinking ability of malay ethnic students in archimedes law with rasch analysis model (RAM): a case study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1), 012050.
Atmojo, S. E., & Kurniawati, W. (2018). Thematic Learning Model of Science, Environment, Technology and society in Improving Elementary Students’ Science Literacy. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 7(1), 59–69.
Atta, H. B., & Aras, I. (2020). Developing an instrument for students science literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1422(1), 012019.
Bahtiar, B., Ibrahim, I., & Maimun, M. (2022). Analysis of Students’ Science literacy Skill in terms of Gender Using Science Teaching Materials Discovery Model Assisted by PhET Simulation. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(3), 371–386.
Dewi, C. A., Khery, Y., & Erna, M. (2019). An ethnoscience study in chemistry learning to develop science literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.19261
Fakhriyah, F., Masfuah, S., Roysa, M., Rusilowati, A., & Rahayu, E. S. (2017). Student’s science literacy in the aspect of content science? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.7245
Fauziyah, A., Prasetyaningsih, P., & Biru, L. T. (2021). Analysis of science literacy skills in solving question science on food security themes in Serang City. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(2), 56–63.
Güçlüer, E., & Kesercioğlu, T. (n.d.). THE EFFECT OF USING ACTIVITIES IMPROVING SCIENCE LITERACY ON STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LESSON. In International Online Journal of Primary Education-2012 (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
Herianingtyas, N. L. R. (2022). Penguatan Literasi Sains Siswa MI/SD melalui Pengembangan E-Modul dengan Instrumen Asesmen berbasis Higher Order Thingking Skills. Elementar: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 2(1), 15–26.
Hobson. (2001). Teaching relevant science for science literacy. Journal of Knowledge Science Teaching, 2(1), 110–116.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362.
Jufri, A. W. , S. S. , & S. D. (2016). Scientific Reasoning Ability Of Prospective Student Teacher in The Excellence Program of Mathematics and Science Teacher Education in University of Mataram. . Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 69–74.
Knain, E. (2015). Science literacy for participation: A systemic functional approach to analysis of school science discourses. Springer.
Lestari, H., Banila, L., & Siskandar, R. (2019). Improving Student’s Science Literacy Competencies Based on Learning Independence with STEM Learning. Biodidaktika: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 14(2).
Miller, J. (2002). Civic Science literacy: A Necessity in the 21st Century. FAS Public Interest Reports, 5(1).
Murnane, R., Sawhill, I., & Snow, C. (2012). Literacy challenges for the twenty-first century: Introducing the issue. Future of Children, 22(2), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2012.0013
Novitasary, V., Cahyani, D., & Mulyani, A. (2018). Penggunaan Homework Berbasis Home Science Process Skill (HSPS) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa pada Materi Interaksi Makhluk Hidup dengan Lingkungan Kelas VII di SMPN 1 Dukupuntang. Jurnal Ilmu Alam Indonesia, 1(1).
Nur Luthfi Rizqa Herianingtyas; Nafia Wafiqni. (2023). EVALUATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SCIENCE LITERACY-BASED LEARNING IN SEKOLAH DASAR. AL-BIDAYAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 15(1), 79–92.
Pujawan, I. G. N., Rediani, N. N., Antara, I., Putri, N., & Bayu, G. W. (2022). Revised bloom taxonomy-oriented learning activities to develop science literacy and creative thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 47–60.
Rahayu, I. D., Permanasari, A., & Heliawati, L. (2022). The Effectiveness of Socioscientific Issue-Based Petroleum Materials Integrated with The Elsmawar Website on Students’ Science literacy. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(2), 279–286.
Rasch, G. (1966). An item analysis which takes individual differences into account. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 19(1), 49–57.
Rosana, D., Widodo, E., Setianingsih, W., & Setyawarno, D. (2020). Developing Assessment Instruments of PISA Model to Measure Students’ Problem-Solving Skills and Science literacy in Junior High Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 8(2), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v8i2.17468
Schleicher, A. (2018). Insights and interpretations. Pisa 2018, 10.
Soobard, R., & Rannikmäe, M. (2011). Assessing student’s level of science literacy using interdisciplinary scenarios. In Science Education International (Vol. 22, Issue 2).
Spitzer, W., & Fraser, J. (2020). Advancing Community Science Literacy. Journal of Museum Education, 45(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2020.1720403
Stone, E. M. (2014). Guiding students to develop an understanding of scientific inquiry: A science skills approach to instruction and assessment. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 90–101.
Suryana, T. G. S., Setyadin, A. H., Samsudin, A., & Kaniawati, I. (2020). Assessing multidimensional energy literacy of high school students: an analysis of rasch model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1), 012034.
Utami, B., Saputro, S., & Masykuri, M. (2016). Science literacy in science lesson. Proceeding of International Conference on Teacher Training and Education, 1(1).
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. In SAGE Open (Vol. 10, Issue 1). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
Widhiarso, W., & Ridho, A. (2022). Validation of Setting and Design of Multi-Stage Testing (MST) to Portray Students’ Achievement on Reading Literacy in AKMI 2021.
Wulandari, N., & Wulandari, N. (2016). ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN LITERASI SAINS PADA ASPEK PENGETAHUAN DAN KOMPETENSI SAINS SISWA SMP PADA MATERI KALOR. EDUSAINS, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i1.1762
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 128 times
Download : 55 times
DOI: 10.54892/jpgmi.v9i2.236
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
